Author

admin

Browsing

Markets don’t usually hit record highs, risk falling into bearish territory, and spring back to new highs within six months. But that’s what happened in 2025.

In this special mid-year recap, Grayson Roze sits down with David Keller, CMT, to show how disciplined routines, price-based signals, and a calm process helped them ride the whipsaw instead of getting tossed by it. You’ll see what really happened under the surface, how investor psychology drove the swings, and the exact StockCharts tools they leaned on to stay objective. 

If you’re focused on protecting capital, generating income, and sleeping well at night while still capturing the upside, this is a must-watch. Discover which charts deserve your attention now, what to ignore, and how to prep for the back half of 2025. 

This video premiered on July 23, 2025. Click on the above image to watch on our dedicated Grayson Roze page on StockCharts TV.

You can view previously recorded videos from Grayson at this link.

The chart of Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has completed a roundtrip from the February high around $740 to the April low at $480 and all the way back again.  Over the last couple weeks, META has now pulled back from its retest of all-time highs, leaving investors to wonder what may come next.

Is this the beginning of a new downtrend phase for META?  Or just a brief pullback before a new uptrend phase propels META to new all-time highs?

Today we’ll look at two potential scenarios, including the double top pattern and the cup and handle pattern, and share which technical indicators and approaches could help us determine which path plays out into August.

The double top scenario basically means that the late July retest of the previous all-time high was the end of the recent uptrend phase.  The double top pattern is literally when a major resistance level is set and then retested.  The implication is that a lack of willing buyers means the uptrend is exhausted, and there is nowhere to go but down.

While the 21-day exponential moving average is currently in play for META, I would say that a break below the 50-day moving average could confirm this as the correct scenario.  If that smoothing mechanism does not hold, then the price action would imply less of a pullback and more like the beginning of a real distribution phase.

What is META pulls back but then resumes an uptrend phase, leading META to another new all-time high?  That would result in a confirmed cup and handle pattern, created by a large rounded bottoming pattern followed by a brief pullback.  The key to this pattern is the “rim” of the cup, which sits right at $740 for META.

Given the pullback META has demonstrated so far in July, I would say that a break above the $740 level would basically confirm a bullish cup and handle pattern.  That would suggest much more upside potential for META, as the stock would literally go into previously uncharted territory.

So how can we determine which scenario is more likely to play out?  This is where we need to incorporate more technical indicators into the discussion, as a way to further validate and confirm our investment thesis.

Just to review, I think a break above $740 would confirm a bullish cup and handle pattern.  I would also say that a break below the $680 level, which would represent a move below the 50-day moving average as well as the June swing lows, would basically confirm a bearish double top pattern.

We can also use the Relative Strength Index (RSI) to help determine whether META remains in a bullish trend phase.  During bull phases, the RSI rarely gets below 40, because buyers usually step in to “buy the dips” and keep the momentum fairly constructive.  So if the price would break down, and the RSI would not hold that crucial 40 level, that could mean a bearish outlook is warranted.

Finally, we can use volume-based indicators to assess whether moves in the price are supported by stronger volume readings.  Here I’ve included the Accumulation/Distribution Line, which tracks the trend in daily volume readings over time.  We can see that the high in July resulted in a divergence, as the A/D line was trending lower.  If the A/D line would break below its June and July lows, marked by a dashed red line, that would represent a bearish volume reading for META.

Technical analysis is less about predicting the future, and more about determining the most probable scenarios based on our analysis of trend, momentum, and volume.  I hope this discussion shows how the outlook for META can be easily determined and tracked using the best practices of technical analysis!

RR#6,

Dave

PS- Ready to upgrade your investment process?  Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

President and Chief Strategist

Sierra Alpha Research LLC

marketmisbehavior.com

https://www.youtube.com/c/MarketMisbehavior

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice.  The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.  

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication.    Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

Is the market’s next surge already underway? Find out with Tom Bowley’s breakdown of where the money is flowing now and how you can get in front of it.

In this video, Tom covers key moves in the major indexes, revealing strength in transports, small caps, and home construction. He identifies industry rotation signals, which are pointing to aluminum, recreational products, and furnishings. Tom then demonstrates how to use StockCharts’ tools to scan for momentum stocks in emerging leadership groups — see why SGI tops Tom’s list. He ends with a discussion of post-earnings reactions from major names like GOOGL, TSLA, IBM, and LVS. 

And, of course, Tom wraps every idea with clear chart setups you can act on today. 

This video premiered on July 24, 2025. Click this link to watch on Tom’s dedicated page.

Missed a session? Archived videos from Tom are available at this link.

The S&P 500 ($SPX) just logged its fifth straight trading box breakout, which means that, of the five trading ranges the index has experienced since the April lows, all have been resolved to the upside.

How much longer can this last? That’s been the biggest question since the massive April 9 rally. Instead of assuming the market is due to roll over, it’s been more productive to track price action and watch for potential changes along the way. So far, drawdowns have been minimal, and breakouts keep occurring. Nothing in the price action hints at a lasting change — yet.

While some are calling this rally “historic,” we have a recent precedent. Recall that from late 2023 through early 2024, the index had a strong start and gave way to a consistent, steady trend.

From late October 2023 through March 2024, the S&P 500 logged seven consecutive trading box breakouts. That streak finally paused with a pullback from late March to early April, which, as we now know, was only a temporary hiccup. Once the bid returned, the S&P 500 went right back to carving new boxes and climbing higher.

New 52-Week Highs Finally Picking Up

If there’s been one gripe about this rally, it’s that the number of new highs within the index has lagged. As we’ve discussed before, among all the internal breadth indicators available, new highs almost always lag — that’s normal. What we really want to see is whether the number of new highs begins to exceed prior peaks as the market continues to rise, which it has, as shown by the blue line in the chart below.

As of Wednesday’s close, 100 S&P 500 stocks were either at new 52-week highs or within 3% of them. That’s a strong base. We expect this number to continue rising as the market climbs, especially if positive earnings reactions persist across sectors.

Even when we get that first day with 100+ S&P 500 stocks making new 52-week highs, though, it might not be the best time to initiate new longs.

The above chart shows that much needs to align for that many stocks to peak in unison, which has historically led to at least a short-term consolidation, if not deeper pullbacks — as highlighted in yellow. Every time is different, of course, but this is something to keep an eye on in the coming weeks.

Trend Check: GoNoGo Still “Go”

The GoNoGo Trend remains in bullish mode, with the recent countertrend signals having yet to trigger a greater pullback.

Active Bullish Patterns

We still have two live bullish upside targets of 6,555 and 6,745, which could be with us for a while going forward. For the S&P 500 to get there, it will need to form new, smaller versions of the trading boxes.

Failed Bearish Patterns

In the chart below, you can view a rising wedge pattern on the recent price action, the third since April. The prior two wedges broke down briefly and did not lead to a major downturn. The largest pullbacks in each case occurred after the S&P 500 dipped below the lower trendline of the pattern.

The deepest drawdown so far is 3.5%, which is not exactly a game-changer. Without downside follow-through, a classic bearish pattern simply can’t be formed, let alone be broken down from.

We’ll continue to monitor these formations as they develop because, at some point, that will change.

Here are some charts that reflect our areas of focus this week at


XLU Leads with New High

Even though the Utilities SPDR (XLU) cannot keep pace with the Technology SPDR (XLK) and Communication Services SPDR (XLC), it is in a leading uptrend. XLU formed a cup-with-handle from November to July and broke to new highs the last two weeks. ETFs hitting new highs are in strong uptrends and should be on our radar.


Metal Mania in 2025

In a tribute to Ozzy, metals are leading the way higher in 2025. The PerfChart below shows year-to-date performance for the continuous futures for 12 commodities. Copper, Platinum and Palladium are up more than 45% year-to-date, while Gold is up 28.38% and Silver is up 35.30%. QQQ is up 10.52% year-to-date, but lagging these metals. The other commodities are mixed.


Multi-Year Highs for Silver and Copper

The next chart shows 11 year bar charts for five metals. Gold broke out in early 2024 and led the metals move with an advance the last 21 months. Silver and copper broke out to multi-year highs. Platinum broke above its 2021 high and Palladium got in the action with an 18 month high. There is a clear message here: metals are moving higher and leading as a group.  


Home Construction Hits Moment of Truth

The Home Construction ETF (ITB) hit its moment of truth as it rose to its falling 40-week SMA. Notice that ITB failed just below this moving average in August 2023. During the 2023-2024 uptrend, the 40-week SMA was more friendly as ITB reversed near this level in October 2023 and June 2024. ITB surged to the falling 40-week SMA in July, but the long-term trend is down and this area could be its nemesis.

Thanks for Tuning in!

See TrendInvestorPro.com for more


Airbus reported a sharp decline in first-quarter earnings on Tuesday, as supply chain disruptions—particularly engine shortages—curbed aircraft deliveries and weighed on profitability.

Adjusted operating profit fell 52% year-on-year to 300 million euros, well below analyst expectations of 348 million euros.

Revenue declined 7% to 12.65 billion euros in the three months to March 31, though slightly above consensus estimates of 12.39 billion euros.

Net profit also dropped 26% to 586 million euros.

The world’s largest planemaker delivered 114 commercial aircraft during the quarter, down 16% from 136 a year earlier and trailing Boeing, which delivered 143 aircraft over the same period.

Despite the weaker performance, Airbus maintained its full-year delivery target of around 870 aircraft for 2026, compared with 793 deliveries in 2025.

Engine shortages and supply issues persist

A key factor behind the slowdown has been ongoing delays in engine deliveries from Pratt & Whitney, a subsidiary of RTX Corporation.

Airbus said the shortage has forced it to slow production of its best-selling A320 jets, even as demand remains strong.

Chief Executive Guillaume Faury acknowledged the ongoing dispute with the supplier, stating:

“We’ve not come to the point where we have an agreement,” Faury said, “but we continue to work both ways — the dispute on the one hand and a negotiation on the other hand to constructively resolve the disagreement we have.”

The company had already initiated steps earlier this year to enforce its contractual rights against the engine maker due to supply shortfalls.

Additional supply chain challenges, including delays in sourcing components such as seats and toilets, have further complicated production timelines.

Airbus has previously trimmed delivery targets in multiple years due to these persistent bottlenecks.

An administrative delay affecting nearly 20 aircraft destined for Chinese customers also contributed to the first-quarter delivery shortfall, though the issue has since been resolved.

Outlook steady despite challenges

Despite near-term headwinds, Airbus reiterated its production and financial targets, signaling confidence in its ability to navigate supply constraints.

The company continues to aim to produce between 70 and 75 A320-family aircraft per month by the end of 2027.

It also reaffirmed plans to ramp up production across other models, including the A220, A330, and A350 in the coming years.

For 2026, Airbus expects adjusted EBIT of around 7.5 billion euros and free cash flow before customer financing of approximately 4.5 billion euros.

Faury noted that geopolitical risks remain a factor, particularly in the Middle East, but emphasized that demand has held up.

“The operating environment remains dynamic and complex. We are closely monitoring the potential impact from the fast-changing situation in the Middle East,” Faury said. “In commercial aircraft, we continue to ramp up and produce as per our plan while navigating the shortage of Pratt & Whitney engines.”

High jet fuel prices are also supporting demand for fuel-efficient aircraft, even as some airlines adjust flight frequencies.

However, persistent supply-chain disruptions have weighed on investor sentiment, with Airbus shares down more than 16% since the start of the year.

Meanwhile, Boeing has regained momentum, supported by improving operations and stronger delivery performance.

Airbus now faces the challenge of accelerating production in the remaining quarters of the year to meet its delivery targets while resolving ongoing supply constraints.

The post Airbus profit halves as engine delays curb deliveries appeared first on Invezz

A pivotal moment for global markets is set to unfold as Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft prepare to report earnings on the same day, offering a rare, concentrated look into the health of the artificial intelligence economy.

The simultaneous results from the four technology giants, which together account for a significant share of the S&P 500, are expected to provide critical insight into whether the massive investments being poured into AI infrastructure are translating into sustainable growth.

“Biggest earnings day ever. To the best of my knowledge, these four largest companies have never put it on the same day, so we’re gonna learn a lot in a very short period of time,” Gil Luria, DA Davidson head of technology research, told Yahoo Finance.

AI spending and data centre expansion under scrutiny

At the centre of investor focus is an unprecedented $650 billion combined capital expenditure plan for 2026, largely directed toward building data centres and expanding AI capabilities.

Analysts say the key question is not just how much these companies are spending, but whether they can execute those plans in an environment constrained by energy shortages, regulatory hurdles and supply bottlenecks.

“There’s been plenty of reporting for the last three months about delays in data centres, a lot of regulation, a lot of constraints on the ability to access electricity,” Luria said, adding that the companies’ commentary will determine whether they can meet timelines for expanding infrastructure.

If these four companies can't build data centres at the rate they want, then everyone else won't be able to live up to their expectations.

Gil Luria
Head of technology research at DA Davidson

The implications extend far beyond Big Tech, affecting chipmakers, equipment suppliers and a growing ecosystem of smaller cloud providers dependent on hyperscaler demand.

Supply constraints threaten AI momentum

Despite surging demand for computing power following the rise of generative AI tools, infrastructure limitations remain a major hurdle.

“The entirety of the AI complex right now is going to be supply-constrained,” Citizens analyst Andrew Boone said.

He noted that insufficient energy and computing infrastructure could limit how quickly companies scale their AI operations.

Part of the question will be who is executing well enough to get capex into the ground.

Andrew Boone
Citizens analyst.

Recent developments highlight the intensity of demand.

Companies such as Anthropic have signed multiple infrastructure deals, while Amazon has announced agreements to supply custom chips to Meta.

Meanwhile, Alphabet said its systems now process more than 16 billion tokens, underscoring rapid growth in AI usage.

What analysts are watching across Big Tech

Each of the four companies faces a distinct set of expectations when reporting results.

At Alphabet, analysts expect Google Cloud to drive growth, supported by enterprise adoption of AI tools such as Gemini.

However, margins will be closely watched as rising capital expenditure feeds into depreciation costs.

Amazon’s results will be judged largely on the performance of Amazon Web Services, particularly its ability to expand capacity and manage backlog amid strong AI demand.

Investors are also looking for clarity on its $200 billion capex plans.

At Meta, attention will centre on how AI investments are improving its core advertising business, including targeting and content recommendations.

Analysts say the company needs to clearly demonstrate how AI is translating into revenue growth.

Microsoft, meanwhile, faces questions around capacity constraints in its Azure business and the pace of AI monetisation through products like Copilot.

Margins, monetisation and market expectations

Beyond infrastructure, investors are increasingly focused on whether AI investments are beginning to generate returns.

“The setup going into earnings is pretty straightforward,” Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik wrote in a note last week.

Companies will need to deliver AI-driven revenue growth, maintain capital expenditure commitments and demonstrate cost discipline through efficiency measures such as layoffs or pricing power.

At the same time, there is a growing debate about whether spending could overshoot expectations.

Some analysts warn that rising capex forecasts may reignite concerns about overspending in the AI race.

A defining moment for the AI trade

The convergence of earnings from the four largest technology companies marks what some analysts describe as one of the most important reporting days in recent years.

Wednesday will be “one of the most significant earnings days in recent memory,” Matt Stucky, chief portfolio manager at Northwestern Mutual, told MarketWatch.

With demand for AI computing power accelerating but infrastructure struggling to keep pace, the results and guidance from these companies are likely to shape investor sentiment not just for Big Tech, but for the broader global economy tied to artificial intelligence.

The post META, MSFT, AMZN, GOOG head for 'biggest earnings day': why it matters appeared first on Invezz

China’s real residential property price index just hit a record low with 17 consecutive quarters of decline.

In real, inflation-adjusted terms, home values are now below where they were in 2010, wiping out fifteen years of appreciation for the country’s urban middle class.

Meanwhile, official GDP grew at 5% in Q1 2026, beating forecasts. So perhaps one headline is more significant than the other.

What the headline number is hiding

The 5% growth figure is not fabricated. But it is being manufactured in a very specific way.

State-owned enterprises are leading a surge in infrastructure and advanced manufacturing investment.

Fiscal spending was front-loaded into Q1 2026. Exports of EVs, batteries, and semiconductors are genuinely booming.

Strip all of that out, and what remains, the organic private-sector-driven activity that reflects how actual Chinese households and businesses are doing, is tracking closer to 3% by several independent estimates.

The property sector, which as recently as 2021 accounted for roughly 24% of GDP, has seen its contribution cut in half.

Property investment collapsed 17.2% in 2025 alone. New home prices in March 2026 marked their 23rd consecutive month of year-on-year decline, including falls of 8% to 12% from peak in cities like Shanghai and Beijing, once considered untouchable.

The BIS real residential property price index closed Q4 2025 at 86.79 on a 2010 base of 100. Prices are not just falling. They have erased the entire decade-and-a-half of real gains.

Property was never just a sector

To understand why this matters so profoundly, you have to understand what property actually was in China. It was the savings account, the pension plan, and the primary store of national wealth, all in one.

Residential real estate represents 70% of urban household assets. Land sales funded roughly 20% of local government fiscal revenue, which in turn paid for hospitals, schools, roads, and public services across hundreds of cities and provinces.

At its peak, the property complex was consuming 60% of global cement output and 50% of global steel. It absorbed 25% of all bank loans in China.

This was not a sector running alongside the economy. It was the economy’s skeleton.

Local government land revenues have fallen 44% from their 2021 peak.

Banks are carrying non-performing exposure that official figures almost certainly understate.

An estimated $18 trillion in household wealth has been destroyed since the peak, a number larger than the entire US GDP.

The doom loop nobody in Beijing wants to name

There is a specific economic concept that fits China’s situation precisely, which is a balance sheet recession. The term was developed by economist Richard Koo to describe Japan after 1991.

When the primary asset of a nation’s households collapses in value, those households rationally respond by saving more and spending less, even when interest rates are near zero.

The correct individual response becomes collectively catastrophic.

Chinese household bank deposits have nearly doubled over the past five years.

Consumer confidence remains depressed. Retail sales growth repeatedly misses forecasts.

The People’s Bank of China can cut rates, and it has, but it cannot manufacture the confidence needed to make people spend.

Monetary policy, in this environment, is a lever disconnected from the machine it is supposed to operate.

The second-order effect is the one poisoning the global trading system. Factories that lose domestic demand do not close. They cut prices and export.

China’s industrial overcapacity is now flooding global markets with cheap steel, chemicals, solar panels, and EVs at prices that competitors in Europe, the US, and Southeast Asia simply cannot match.

This looks like Chinese industrial strength. It is, in significant part, Chinese domestic weakness finding an exit valve, and it is the primary driver of the trade tensions escalating around it.

What investors are actually buying when they buy China

The green industrial complex is real. Output in AI-adjacent sectors, including integrated circuits, grew nearly 50% year-on-year in Q1 2026.

EV exports surged 77.5%.

Lithium battery production rose over 40%.

China is winning the green technology race decisively, and these are not manufactured numbers. For investors with long horizons and tolerance for policy risk, there is genuine value in the sectors Beijing has chosen to champion.

The problem is that these industries do not employ enough people, at sufficient wages, to replace the economic mass of what property used to generate.

A semiconductor fab is not a jobs engine. An EV export line does not rebuild the confidence of a household sitting on a mortgage worth more than the apartment securing it.

Goldman Sachs estimates the property downturn dragged approximately 2 percentage points off annual GDP growth in both 2024 and 2025.

The generation that bought the dream

The sharpest way to understand what is happening in China is not through GDP tables or BIS indices. It is through the young professionals who stretched their savings and their parents’ savings to buy an apartment in 2019 or 2020.

That person is now servicing a mortgage on an asset worth 23% less in real terms than when they bought it, in a job market where youth unemployment runs at approximately 20% officially and significantly higher by independent estimates.

They are not consuming. They are not investing. They are doing what every rational actor does in this situation: waiting, saving, and hoping the floor arrives before the ceiling closes in.

Multiply that across tens of millions of households, and you have the actual state of the Chinese economy in 2026.

The GDP number tells you what the state is building.

The property price chart tells you what people are living.

Beijing can paper over the second story with the first one for a while longer, but the BIS data doesn’t take instructions from anyone.

The post Is China's economic resilience masking a real estate collapse? appeared first on Invezz

Is the market’s next surge already underway? Find out with Tom Bowley’s breakdown of where the money is flowing now and how you can get in front of it.

In this video, Tom covers key moves in the major indexes, revealing strength in transports, small caps, and home construction. He identifies industry rotation signals, which are pointing to aluminum, recreational products, and furnishings. Tom then demonstrates how to use StockCharts’ tools to scan for momentum stocks in emerging leadership groups — see why SGI tops Tom’s list. He ends with a discussion of post-earnings reactions from major names like GOOGL, TSLA, IBM, and LVS. 

And, of course, Tom wraps every idea with clear chart setups you can act on today. 

This video premiered on July 24, 2025. Click this link to watch on Tom’s dedicated page.

Missed a session? Archived videos from Tom are available at this link.

The chart of Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has completed a roundtrip from the February high around $740 to the April low at $480 and all the way back again.  Over the last couple weeks, META has now pulled back from its retest of all-time highs, leaving investors to wonder what may come next.

Is this the beginning of a new downtrend phase for META?  Or just a brief pullback before a new uptrend phase propels META to new all-time highs?

Today we’ll look at two potential scenarios, including the double top pattern and the cup and handle pattern, and share which technical indicators and approaches could help us determine which path plays out into August.

The double top scenario basically means that the late July retest of the previous all-time high was the end of the recent uptrend phase.  The double top pattern is literally when a major resistance level is set and then retested.  The implication is that a lack of willing buyers means the uptrend is exhausted, and there is nowhere to go but down.

While the 21-day exponential moving average is currently in play for META, I would say that a break below the 50-day moving average could confirm this as the correct scenario.  If that smoothing mechanism does not hold, then the price action would imply less of a pullback and more like the beginning of a real distribution phase.

What is META pulls back but then resumes an uptrend phase, leading META to another new all-time high?  That would result in a confirmed cup and handle pattern, created by a large rounded bottoming pattern followed by a brief pullback.  The key to this pattern is the “rim” of the cup, which sits right at $740 for META.

Given the pullback META has demonstrated so far in July, I would say that a break above the $740 level would basically confirm a bullish cup and handle pattern.  That would suggest much more upside potential for META, as the stock would literally go into previously uncharted territory.

So how can we determine which scenario is more likely to play out?  This is where we need to incorporate more technical indicators into the discussion, as a way to further validate and confirm our investment thesis.

Just to review, I think a break above $740 would confirm a bullish cup and handle pattern.  I would also say that a break below the $680 level, which would represent a move below the 50-day moving average as well as the June swing lows, would basically confirm a bearish double top pattern.

We can also use the Relative Strength Index (RSI) to help determine whether META remains in a bullish trend phase.  During bull phases, the RSI rarely gets below 40, because buyers usually step in to “buy the dips” and keep the momentum fairly constructive.  So if the price would break down, and the RSI would not hold that crucial 40 level, that could mean a bearish outlook is warranted.

Finally, we can use volume-based indicators to assess whether moves in the price are supported by stronger volume readings.  Here I’ve included the Accumulation/Distribution Line, which tracks the trend in daily volume readings over time.  We can see that the high in July resulted in a divergence, as the A/D line was trending lower.  If the A/D line would break below its June and July lows, marked by a dashed red line, that would represent a bearish volume reading for META.

Technical analysis is less about predicting the future, and more about determining the most probable scenarios based on our analysis of trend, momentum, and volume.  I hope this discussion shows how the outlook for META can be easily determined and tracked using the best practices of technical analysis!

RR#6,

Dave

PS- Ready to upgrade your investment process?  Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

President and Chief Strategist

Sierra Alpha Research LLC

marketmisbehavior.com

https://www.youtube.com/c/MarketMisbehavior

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice.  The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.  

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication.    Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.