Author

admin

Browsing

Samsung Electronics is facing the threat of a large-scale labour strike after bonus payment talks between management and the company’s union collapsed.

    The strike, scheduled to begin on Thursday, could have major implications for South Korea’s economy and the global supply of memory chips.

    Around 48,000 workers are expected to participate in the planned 18-day walkout.

    The scale of the strike has prompted discussions over whether the South Korean government could issue an emergency arbitration order to halt the industrial action temporarily.

    Government says talks can continue

    A South Korean government official said on Wednesday that discussions around an emergency arbitration order were premature.

    The official added that there was still room for dialogue between Samsung Electronics and the labour union.

    The government is generally viewed as labour-friendly under President Lee Jae Myung, who previously worked as a youth labourer and suffered injuries while on the job.

    However, Lee criticised what he described as excessive demands from a union during a cabinet meeting on Wednesday.

    He said a certain union was crossing the line by demanding a share of a company’s operating profit before income tax payments were made.

    “There is a role for the government when anyone crosses the line to make sure they conduct themselves responsibly for the good of the larger community,” Lee said during the meeting.

    What does an emergency arbitration order mean

    South Korea has used an emergency arbitration order only four times in modern history.

    Such a measure would suspend the strike for 30 days while both sides continue negotiations under mediation from the National Labor Relations Commission.

    The government can invoke the order if authorities determine that a strike could cause “significant injury to the national economy”.

    If mediation efforts fail, the dispute would move to a separate arbitration panel.

    The panel would hear arguments from both sides before issuing a legally binding decision.

    Under South Korean law, individuals who refuse to comply with the order could face up to two years in prison or fines of up to 20 million won, equivalent to around $13,300.

    The last time the measure was used was in 2005 during a strike by Korean Air pilots.

    The dispute ended after four days when both sides agreed on a compromise wage increase.

    Economic concerns grow over Samsung disruption

    The potential strike has raised concerns because Samsung Electronics plays a central role in South Korea’s economy.

    The company accounts for nearly a quarter of the country’s exports and is also the world’s largest memory chip manufacturer.

    Any major disruption to production could affect global semiconductor supply chains, particularly at a time when demand linked to artificial intelligence has already caused chip shortages.

    An unnamed official from South Korea’s central bank warned that, in a worst-case scenario, the strike could reduce the country’s projected economic growth for the year by 0.5 percentage points.

    The current growth forecast stands at 2.0%.

    South Korean officials have also estimated that severe production disruptions at Samsung Electronics could result in daily losses of up to 1 trillion won, or around $665 million, for the company.

    Political risks ahead of local elections

    The labour dispute could also carry political implications ahead of South Korea’s local elections on June 3, when voters will elect mayors and governors nationwide.

    President Lee’s liberal bloc is currently expected to perform strongly in the elections.

    However, the ongoing strike threat could influence swing districts and affect labour support, which has traditionally backed liberal candidates.

    Lee is also seeking support in Gyeonggi province, an economically important region where thousands of workers are employed at Samsung facilities.

    Samsung’s labour union was established only two years ago and is not affiliated with any of South Korea’s major labour federations.

    Despite that, several established and more militant unions have pledged solidarity support for Samsung workers during the dispute.

    The post Samsung labour dispute sparks fears over chip supply disruptions appeared first on Invezz

    The European Commission on Thursday signed a memorandum of understanding with Ukraine on a macro-financial assistance programme, paving the way for a €3.2 billion disbursement expected in mid-June once the agreement is ratified by the Ukrainian parliament.

    The macro-financial assistance forms part of the European Union’s broader €90 billion financing scheme aimed at supporting Kyiv throughout 2026 and 2027 as Ukraine continues to defend itself against Russia’s invasion.

    EU finalises negotiations with Ukraine

    European Economic Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis said the negotiations surrounding the memorandum had been completed and confirmed that the document had already been signed by the European Commission.

    “We have finalised our negotiations with Ukraine on the ⁠memorandum of understanding underpinning our macro financial assistance program as part of the Ukraine support loan,” Dombrovskis said, as cited in a Reuters report.

    “I signed it this morning, and now it’s still for the Ukrainian side to sign, and it also needs to be ratified by the Rada in Ukraine, so that we can then proceed with disbursements,” he told reporters.

    The agreement represents a key step in the implementation of the EU’s large-scale financing package intended to provide economic and fiscal support to Ukraine over the next two years.

    €90 billion package to support Ukraine

    Dombrovskis said the agreement covering the entire €90 billion loan programme could be signed within days.

    According to the commissioner, €45 billion from the package is scheduled to be disbursed this year, while the remaining €45 billion is expected to be provided in 2027.

    The funding package is designed to help Ukraine maintain government operations and continue financing essential spending amid the ongoing war.

    Of the funds expected to be disbursed this year, €28.3 billion has been allocated for military expenditure, while €16.7 billion is intended for general budget support.

    The general budget support component is evenly divided between the macro-financial assistance programme and the Ukraine Facility, which is focused on Ukraine’s recovery, reconstruction, and modernisation efforts.

    Aid tied to fiscal reforms

    Dombrovskis said the macro-financial assistance would remain conditional on Ukraine implementing a series of reforms, particularly in the area of fiscal policy and public financial management.

    According to him, the conditions attached to the programme are aimed at strengthening domestic revenue mobilisation, improving the efficiency of public spending, and enhancing Ukraine’s public financial management systems.

    “We also coordinated closely with the International Monetary Fund so that conditions are consistent and, where necessary, let’s say additional or complementary to the IMF program,” Dombrovskis said.

    The commissioner noted that coordination with the International Monetary Fund was intended to ensure alignment between the EU’s financial support measures and the IMF’s existing programme for Ukraine.

    The memorandum now awaits signing by the Ukrainian side and ratification by Ukraine’s parliament before the planned mid-June disbursement can move forward.

    The post EU and Ukraine move closer to €90 billion support loan agreement appeared first on Invezz

    Indian stocks are stuck in a correction this week as concerns about the economy remain. The blue-chip Nifty 50 Index retreated to ₹23,650 on Tuesday, down by 10% from its highest point this year. This retreat has coincided with the crashing Indian rupee and bonds.

    Indian stocks retreat amid US-Iran war concerns

    The Nifty 50 Index has remained under pressure as investors remain concerned about the country’s economy amid the ongoing US-Iran war.

    India has become highly exposed because of its overreliance on Gulf oil and gas, which comes months after the country reduced its Russian oil purchases amid US pressure. 

    The war has pushed inflation higher in the country, with the most recent report showing that the headline CPI jumped to 3.48% in April from the previous 3.4%. It was the fastest inflation rate in over a year, and analysts predict that the situation will get worse in the near term. 

    The soaring inflation has had a major impact on individuals and companies in the country, who are now paying more money. It has also raised the possibility that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will hike interest rates in the coming months.

    Indian stocks have retreated this week amid concerns that Trump will restart the war, which has pushed crude oil prices higher. The most recent data shows that Brent and WTI prices have remained at an elevated levels this year. 

    Soaring Indian bond yields and falling rupee

    The Nifty 50 Index has also underperformed its global peers because of the risings surge in the cost of borrowing. Data shows that the ten-year bond yields jumped to 7.13%, its highest level since May 2024. It has been in a strong uptrend from last year’s low of 6.128%. 

    Similarly, the five-year bond yields have soared to 6.934%, its highest point since March 2nd this year. Rising government bond yields make it more expensive for companies to borrow money, hitting their margins. 

    Meanwhile, the Indian rupee has become one of the worst-performing currencies globally. The USD/INR pair has soared to 96.35, a record high, which is also much higher than last year’s low of 84. Also, the GBP/INR and EUR/INR have jumped to 129.27 and 112.19, respectively. 

    A weaker Indian rupee makes stocks less attractive to foreign investors because they often lose when they convert their holdings to dollars. 

    Nifty 50 Index technical analysis

    Nifty 50 Index chart | Source: TradingView

    The daily chart shows that the Nifty 50 Index bottomed at ₹22,165 in April as the impact of the war continue. It jumped to a high of ₹24,592 on April 21. It formed a double-top pattern, a common bearish reversal sign in technical analysis.

    The index is attempting to fill the gap that formed on April 8 this year. It has also remained below the 50-day and 100-day moving averages. 

    Therefore, the most likely scenario is where the index continues falling, potentially to the key support level at ₹23,000. On the flip side, a move above the 100-day moving average at ₹24,430 will invalidate the bearish outlook.

    The post Nifty 50 Index at risk as Indian bond yields surge, rupee crash appeared first on Invezz

    The European Parliament has approved new foreign direct investment (FDI) screening rules that were provisionally agreed in December with the Council of the European Union, the institution representing EU member states.

    The legislation still requires formal approval from the Council before it can enter into force 18 months later.

    Once implemented, EU countries will be required to screen investments in a range of sensitive sectors, including defence, dual-use goods, and critical technologies.

    The revised framework is aimed at strengthening oversight of foreign investments across the European Union while providing greater consistency in screening procedures among the bloc’s 27 member states.

    Sensitive sectors brought under stricter scrutiny

    Under the new rules, investments in sectors considered strategically important will face mandatory screening requirements.

    The legislation specifically identifies areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, semiconductors, and raw materials as key sectors requiring closer oversight.

    Other sectors covered under the rules include aerospace, energy, transport, digital infrastructure, and entities linked to the financial system.

    Electoral infrastructure, including registration databases and voting systems, will also fall under the scope of the legislation.

    The new framework reflects growing concerns within the European Union over foreign involvement in sectors considered critical to economic security and technological sovereignty.

    The scope expanded beyond traditional foreign investment

    The revised rules expand the scope of the EU’s investment screening framework beyond conventional foreign direct investment.

    The legislation will also apply to intra-EU investments carried out by companies that are ultimately owned by investors from third countries.

    This marks a significant expansion of the bloc’s oversight powers, as authorities will now be able to review investment structures involving foreign ownership even when transactions occur within the EU.

    Lawmakers said the new rules are designed to streamline screening parameters across the bloc and create more certainty for investors operating in the European market.

    The harmonised framework is also expected to reduce inconsistencies between member states in how foreign investment reviews are conducted.

    EU lawmakers highlight sovereignty concerns

    Raphael Glucksmann, the EU lawmaker who led the legislative file, said the new rules represent a shift in the European Union’s approach towards foreign investment and economic security.

    “With this text, we are closing a chapter of European naivety. Certain foreign states are seeking to weaken us,” Glucksmann said in a statement.

    “We are turning the page on the wilful blindness of member states that allowed foreign actors to seize control of sensitive sectors of our economy,” he added.

    Glucksmann also said the EU’s work on foreign investment oversight was not complete and linked the legislation to broader efforts aimed at strengthening Europe’s industrial and economic independence.

    “But our work on foreign investment is not finished the fight for Europe’s independence and sovereignty continues, now with the proposed Industrial Accelerator Act,” he said.

    The legislation is part of the European Union’s broader push to reinforce economic resilience and reduce vulnerabilities in strategically important industries. 

    The post EU Parliament approves tougher foreign investment screening rules appeared first on Invezz

    The chart of Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has completed a roundtrip from the February high around $740 to the April low at $480 and all the way back again.  Over the last couple weeks, META has now pulled back from its retest of all-time highs, leaving investors to wonder what may come next.

    Is this the beginning of a new downtrend phase for META?  Or just a brief pullback before a new uptrend phase propels META to new all-time highs?

    Today we’ll look at two potential scenarios, including the double top pattern and the cup and handle pattern, and share which technical indicators and approaches could help us determine which path plays out into August.

    The double top scenario basically means that the late July retest of the previous all-time high was the end of the recent uptrend phase.  The double top pattern is literally when a major resistance level is set and then retested.  The implication is that a lack of willing buyers means the uptrend is exhausted, and there is nowhere to go but down.

    While the 21-day exponential moving average is currently in play for META, I would say that a break below the 50-day moving average could confirm this as the correct scenario.  If that smoothing mechanism does not hold, then the price action would imply less of a pullback and more like the beginning of a real distribution phase.

    What is META pulls back but then resumes an uptrend phase, leading META to another new all-time high?  That would result in a confirmed cup and handle pattern, created by a large rounded bottoming pattern followed by a brief pullback.  The key to this pattern is the “rim” of the cup, which sits right at $740 for META.

    Given the pullback META has demonstrated so far in July, I would say that a break above the $740 level would basically confirm a bullish cup and handle pattern.  That would suggest much more upside potential for META, as the stock would literally go into previously uncharted territory.

    So how can we determine which scenario is more likely to play out?  This is where we need to incorporate more technical indicators into the discussion, as a way to further validate and confirm our investment thesis.

    Just to review, I think a break above $740 would confirm a bullish cup and handle pattern.  I would also say that a break below the $680 level, which would represent a move below the 50-day moving average as well as the June swing lows, would basically confirm a bearish double top pattern.

    We can also use the Relative Strength Index (RSI) to help determine whether META remains in a bullish trend phase.  During bull phases, the RSI rarely gets below 40, because buyers usually step in to “buy the dips” and keep the momentum fairly constructive.  So if the price would break down, and the RSI would not hold that crucial 40 level, that could mean a bearish outlook is warranted.

    Finally, we can use volume-based indicators to assess whether moves in the price are supported by stronger volume readings.  Here I’ve included the Accumulation/Distribution Line, which tracks the trend in daily volume readings over time.  We can see that the high in July resulted in a divergence, as the A/D line was trending lower.  If the A/D line would break below its June and July lows, marked by a dashed red line, that would represent a bearish volume reading for META.

    Technical analysis is less about predicting the future, and more about determining the most probable scenarios based on our analysis of trend, momentum, and volume.  I hope this discussion shows how the outlook for META can be easily determined and tracked using the best practices of technical analysis!

    RR#6,

    Dave

    PS- Ready to upgrade your investment process?  Check out my free behavioral investing course!

    David Keller, CMT

    President and Chief Strategist

    Sierra Alpha Research LLC

    marketmisbehavior.com

    https://www.youtube.com/c/MarketMisbehavior

    Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice.  The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.  

    The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication.    Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

    Markets don’t usually hit record highs, risk falling into bearish territory, and spring back to new highs within six months. But that’s what happened in 2025.

    In this special mid-year recap, Grayson Roze sits down with David Keller, CMT, to show how disciplined routines, price-based signals, and a calm process helped them ride the whipsaw instead of getting tossed by it. You’ll see what really happened under the surface, how investor psychology drove the swings, and the exact StockCharts tools they leaned on to stay objective. 

    If you’re focused on protecting capital, generating income, and sleeping well at night while still capturing the upside, this is a must-watch. Discover which charts deserve your attention now, what to ignore, and how to prep for the back half of 2025. 

    This video premiered on July 23, 2025. Click on the above image to watch on our dedicated Grayson Roze page on StockCharts TV.

    You can view previously recorded videos from Grayson at this link.

    Here are some charts that reflect our areas of focus this week at


    XLU Leads with New High

    Even though the Utilities SPDR (XLU) cannot keep pace with the Technology SPDR (XLK) and Communication Services SPDR (XLC), it is in a leading uptrend. XLU formed a cup-with-handle from November to July and broke to new highs the last two weeks. ETFs hitting new highs are in strong uptrends and should be on our radar.


    Metal Mania in 2025

    In a tribute to Ozzy, metals are leading the way higher in 2025. The PerfChart below shows year-to-date performance for the continuous futures for 12 commodities. Copper, Platinum and Palladium are up more than 45% year-to-date, while Gold is up 28.38% and Silver is up 35.30%. QQQ is up 10.52% year-to-date, but lagging these metals. The other commodities are mixed.


    Multi-Year Highs for Silver and Copper

    The next chart shows 11 year bar charts for five metals. Gold broke out in early 2024 and led the metals move with an advance the last 21 months. Silver and copper broke out to multi-year highs. Platinum broke above its 2021 high and Palladium got in the action with an 18 month high. There is a clear message here: metals are moving higher and leading as a group.  


    Home Construction Hits Moment of Truth

    The Home Construction ETF (ITB) hit its moment of truth as it rose to its falling 40-week SMA. Notice that ITB failed just below this moving average in August 2023. During the 2023-2024 uptrend, the 40-week SMA was more friendly as ITB reversed near this level in October 2023 and June 2024. ITB surged to the falling 40-week SMA in July, but the long-term trend is down and this area could be its nemesis.

    Thanks for Tuning in!

    See TrendInvestorPro.com for more


    Is the market’s next surge already underway? Find out with Tom Bowley’s breakdown of where the money is flowing now and how you can get in front of it.

    In this video, Tom covers key moves in the major indexes, revealing strength in transports, small caps, and home construction. He identifies industry rotation signals, which are pointing to aluminum, recreational products, and furnishings. Tom then demonstrates how to use StockCharts’ tools to scan for momentum stocks in emerging leadership groups — see why SGI tops Tom’s list. He ends with a discussion of post-earnings reactions from major names like GOOGL, TSLA, IBM, and LVS. 

    And, of course, Tom wraps every idea with clear chart setups you can act on today. 

    This video premiered on July 24, 2025. Click this link to watch on Tom’s dedicated page.

    Missed a session? Archived videos from Tom are available at this link.

    The S&P 500 ($SPX) just logged its fifth straight trading box breakout, which means that, of the five trading ranges the index has experienced since the April lows, all have been resolved to the upside.

    How much longer can this last? That’s been the biggest question since the massive April 9 rally. Instead of assuming the market is due to roll over, it’s been more productive to track price action and watch for potential changes along the way. So far, drawdowns have been minimal, and breakouts keep occurring. Nothing in the price action hints at a lasting change — yet.

    While some are calling this rally “historic,” we have a recent precedent. Recall that from late 2023 through early 2024, the index had a strong start and gave way to a consistent, steady trend.

    From late October 2023 through March 2024, the S&P 500 logged seven consecutive trading box breakouts. That streak finally paused with a pullback from late March to early April, which, as we now know, was only a temporary hiccup. Once the bid returned, the S&P 500 went right back to carving new boxes and climbing higher.

    New 52-Week Highs Finally Picking Up

    If there’s been one gripe about this rally, it’s that the number of new highs within the index has lagged. As we’ve discussed before, among all the internal breadth indicators available, new highs almost always lag — that’s normal. What we really want to see is whether the number of new highs begins to exceed prior peaks as the market continues to rise, which it has, as shown by the blue line in the chart below.

    As of Wednesday’s close, 100 S&P 500 stocks were either at new 52-week highs or within 3% of them. That’s a strong base. We expect this number to continue rising as the market climbs, especially if positive earnings reactions persist across sectors.

    Even when we get that first day with 100+ S&P 500 stocks making new 52-week highs, though, it might not be the best time to initiate new longs.

    The above chart shows that much needs to align for that many stocks to peak in unison, which has historically led to at least a short-term consolidation, if not deeper pullbacks — as highlighted in yellow. Every time is different, of course, but this is something to keep an eye on in the coming weeks.

    Trend Check: GoNoGo Still “Go”

    The GoNoGo Trend remains in bullish mode, with the recent countertrend signals having yet to trigger a greater pullback.

    Active Bullish Patterns

    We still have two live bullish upside targets of 6,555 and 6,745, which could be with us for a while going forward. For the S&P 500 to get there, it will need to form new, smaller versions of the trading boxes.

    Failed Bearish Patterns

    In the chart below, you can view a rising wedge pattern on the recent price action, the third since April. The prior two wedges broke down briefly and did not lead to a major downturn. The largest pullbacks in each case occurred after the S&P 500 dipped below the lower trendline of the pattern.

    The deepest drawdown so far is 3.5%, which is not exactly a game-changer. Without downside follow-through, a classic bearish pattern simply can’t be formed, let alone be broken down from.

    We’ll continue to monitor these formations as they develop because, at some point, that will change.

    European stock index futures are diving today, May 18, as geopolitical tensions and bond yields jump. The FTSE 100 Index futures dropped by 1.71%, while the DAX Index and CAC 40 retreated by over 1%. The broad Stoxx 50 Index futures fell by over 1.3%.

    FTSE 100, DAX, CAC 40, and Stoxx drop amid rising geopolitical risks

    European stock futures pulled back on Monday, continuing a trend that has been going on since last week. The Stoxx 50 Index futures retreated to €5,746, while the DAX fell by 1.15% to €23,670. Similarly, the CAC 40 futures fell by 1.17% to €7,860, while Italy’s FTSE MIB fell by 0.85% to €48,680.

    European stock indices are falling | Source: TradingEconomics

    European futures retreated as concerns about the global economy continued, with President Donald Trump warning that he may have to restart his war to push Iran to make a deal. Besides, the US has already gathered thousands of troops in the region, and analysts predict that the attack will be imminent now that his China trip has ended.

    Renewed strikes between the US and China would have a major impact on the European economy. For one, it would push crude oil prices higher. Brent, the global benchmark, has jumped to $111, while the West Texas Intermediate rising to $109. 

    A strike would lead to higher prices as Iran has warned that it would intensify its attacks against Middle East energy infrastructure, including the Saudi Arabian pipeline. It would also use its military might in the region to shut the Red Sea, where 12% of the world’s oil transit. 

    Soaring inflation and bond yields

    European stocks are also slipping as local bond yields jump amid fears that inflation will continue rising, pushing the ECB to hike interest rates. 

    Data shows that the ten-year bond yields jumped to 3.17%, its highest level since May 2011. Similarly, in France, the ten-year rose to 3.99% from the pandemic low of minus 0.60%. In Italy, the yield has jumped to 3.95%, while in Spain, it jumped to 3.62%. 

    Analysts predict that European inflation will continue soaring this year. The most recent data showed that the headline CPI rose from 2.6% in March to 3% in April. As a result, the European Central Bank hinted that it will hike rates in the April meeting.

    UK political conditions are worsening

    The FTSE 100 Index is the worst-performing European index because there are rising concerns that the UK is becoming ungovernable. Keir Starmer, who led the Labor Party to a big victory in 2024, is now on the verge of losing his seat. 

    The main challenge is that the UK has now had four prime ministers in the last decade. This has made the premiership role less attractive as the next one too will likely not finish his term. 

    Businesses prefer a situation where there is political stability, something that has become rare in the UK. This also explains why the GBP/USD pair has collapsed harder than other currencies this year. 

    The post Here’s why DAX, CAC 40, FTSE 100, and Stoxx 50 indices are crashing appeared first on Invezz